![fonts like gabriola fonts like gabriola](https://cdn.myfonts.net/s/aw/720x360/582/1/298055.png)
![fonts like gabriola fonts like gabriola](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5d405a6d2e62a50001309a4f/1597266439493-KDN3KJNVCS5F0TZF888B/lavilo-webdesign-typography.png)
Visual Studio 2010 may also be able to support it through an addin which changes the WPF options of the editor, since the oldstyle option exists in XAML and Visual Studio 2010 and later uses WPF.Īnother solution is to use a real oldstyle font, but with syntax highlighting for digits: Microsoft Word 2010 seems to support old-style option for OpenType fonts, but I don't have Office 2010 to actually test it.
FONTS LIKE GABRIOLA HOW TO
I can't find neither how you can turn this feature on in Visual Studio, nor even how to do it in Microsoft Word 2007, but you may deep more in this direction if oldstyle is something you really need, but can't afford losing the strong points of monospace fonts. For example, Consolas font has this feature. If you're in love with oldstyle figures, there are two other solutions.Īctually, OpenType has an oldstyle feature for some non-oldstyle fonts. See for example Gabriola or High Tower Text: those two characters seem identical. In conclusion, most oldstyle fonts suffer from the similarity between the small letter "o" and the digit "0", and in many cases, there is no way at all to make the difference between the two. This font is for happy new year cards, not for programming.
![fonts like gabriola fonts like gabriola](https://www.dafont.com/forum/attach/orig/7/7/770185.png)
GabriolaĪs you can see, the font is impossible to use, unless you set a very large size in your IDE. This sole issue is a deal breaker for an IDE. On the other hand, this font suffers the same issue that Garamond: no clear difference between the small letter "o" and the digit "0". Due to oldstyle, numbers are very easy to read too. The font is very readable, even with a small size text. Seriously, is it CoordinatesOfo or CoordinatesOf0? This sole issue is a deal breaker for an IDE. The largest issue is that there is nearly no way to make the difference between the small letter "o" and the digit "0". On an LCD screen, small text has some glitches with whitespace which feels not very uniform (as you can see on the screenshot). This is a nice font, but was rather designed for print. If you use ClearType, Consolas is an excellent choice. It remains very readable for both large and small sizes and for both light text on dark background and dark text on light background contexts. It totally removes the ambiguity between the letter "O" and the digit "0" by using slashed zero character. The recent Consolas font was specifically created to use in IDEs and other source code-related contexts and to replace the former Courier New. Same problem with digit "0" and capital "O", but compared to Courier New, the text is easy to read even on black background. The text is too light, which would make it difficult to read on a black background with light text. Simple to use, but hard to make the difference between the digit "0" and the capital "O". In order to avoid duplicates and shorten the answer, I take only three oldstyle fonts: Georgia, Corbel and Gabriola and three classical fonts: Courier New, Lucida Console and Consolas. There are multiple oldstyle fonts installed by default in Windows/Microsoft Office:
FONTS LIKE GABRIOLA FREE
I have only Windows environment for tests if anyone could add illustrations for fonts used in MacOS or Linux, feel free to edit the answer. Note that all (nearly all?) oldstyle fonts are proportional, while proportional fonts have some issues when using them in programming context.Īside that, let's test and compare some oldstyle fonts to the fonts usually used in IDEs. If you find an oldstyle font more readable, pick it. In most IDEs, you may choose whatever font you like. So all monospaced fonts have tabular figures, but most proportional fonts do not. Tabular figures are figures spaced with equal width they may be lining or oldstyle. If one is comparing columns of figures, a number like "1265" will look very different from "1285", since the former will have a flag on the "6" that sticks up far above any feature of the latter. On the other hand, multi-digit numbers written with old-style numerals have different shapes. parse "8675309" as "eight six seven five three oh ni-y-ine"), the "lining" forms with unified ascent and descent are easier to read. In general, if one is trying to examine numbers as numbers (e.g. Typically, for example, a "0" will be slightly larger than a lowercase "o" the "6" and "9" will have have circles that are sized and placed similar to a "0", with flags extending up and down from that. Old-style figures are numerals which are drawn with variable ascent and descent.
![fonts like gabriola fonts like gabriola](https://hanselmanblogcontent.azureedge.net/WindowsLiveWriter/1fa1a7e5c4f5_935B/image_22.png)
Are there any low-ambiguity fonts, monospaced or proportional, that have text figures and other programming-friendly features, such as marked zeroes aligned braces, operations, and other symbols and bold and italic forms with identical width to regular? I find that oldstyle (or text) figures are much easier to read in any context outside of simple assignment.